What is Good for the Many is Not Necessarily Good for the Few
chr.iswong.com
If something is good for an individual, it’s good for everyone. I think most people would agree with this statement. But I don’t think it’s true. The specific case I’m thinking about is agriculture. Having a steady source of calories is good for the population. More people will survive. However, the proportion of ideal outcomes is lower. You will see fewer people of extreme physical fitness. While a hunter-gatherer lifestyle has more volatility. It’s harder to survive the lean times, but in good times, the individuals are stronger.
What is Good for the Many is Not Necessarily Good for the Few
What is Good for the Many is Not Necessarily…
What is Good for the Many is Not Necessarily Good for the Few
If something is good for an individual, it’s good for everyone. I think most people would agree with this statement. But I don’t think it’s true. The specific case I’m thinking about is agriculture. Having a steady source of calories is good for the population. More people will survive. However, the proportion of ideal outcomes is lower. You will see fewer people of extreme physical fitness. While a hunter-gatherer lifestyle has more volatility. It’s harder to survive the lean times, but in good times, the individuals are stronger.