Subjective Experiences
It’s impossible to convince someone that your taste is correct, and it’s even harder to convince them that their taste is wrong.
We say that opinion is subjective. And that means that the factual descriptions can’t describe why you like something. For example, you could say that some food has 10,000 Scoville1 units, but that doesn’t explain why you like it. If it had 9,999, would you even be able to tell the difference?
Years ago, I tried convincing my friend why he should ski more. He had only skied on the east coast and had only done day trips. East Coast skiing usually has terrible conditions and day trips are hectic, especially with kids. So I was laying out all these solutions to his logistical complaints. But, looking back, there was no point in even trying to convince him. He fundamentally saw skiing as pointless.
This is why logos is only one of three parts in rhetoric.
Judgement is fundamentally pointless. But it also means that other people judging you doesn’t mean anything.
Measurement of how spicy a food is.
I agree that other people judging you doesn’t mean anything. But judgement isn't entirely pointless.
Every judgement I make about others says something about me. It shows me what I value deep down inside even if I refuse to admit it on the surface. Every act of judgement is an opportunity for learning and growth (for the "judge").
I also see judgement as an unconscious defense mechanism for our egos. Which is just to say that it's not something we can just stop doing. Have you tried? So, we may as well make the most of them as learning opportunities.