A reader asked me what the difference is between developing taste and learning. Developing taste is a meta-level above learning. Itâs figuring out what tools/skills/resources work best for you. Suppose you have three options to solve a problem. First, you would have to learn the basics for each of the three. Then youâd have to pick the one that best works for you. Or you would have to determine which option matches up with what specific situation the best. And then youâd have to work out how to best implement that option.
Letâs take the simple example of traveling through New York City. I can walk, bike, take public transportation, or take an Uber. Â
Even if youâre Lance Armstrong, the circumstances will determine which transportation you should take. Is there a time constraint? Whatâs the weather like? Are you near a subway stop? Do you want to enjoy the trip?
There are an infinite number of preferences that you subconsciously consider as you develop taste.
And once youâve chosen how to get there, you can still refine the journey. Do you want to window shop if youâre walking? Do you know which train car is near the exit you want to leave the station from? Do you know where the bike lanes are and which direction traffic goes?
The distinction I would make between learning and taste development is learning is knowing how to perform a specific action while taste development is fitting the action to my preferences. Â
Pablo Picasso supposedly said, "You need to know the rules in order to break them."
To develop taste, you need to learn the underlying skills, learn your own motivation, and learn how to use the underlying skills to accomplish what you want.
đ Writing of the Week:
Iâve been writing unpolished, around 100-word mini-essays. Just reflections on ideas from podcasts or things on the news. Here are the latest:
1ď¸âŁ Maniacs Save Money
2ď¸âŁ 2x Speed
3ď¸âŁ The Ticking Bomb
4ď¸âŁ Things You Can't Aim at Directly
đ Discoveries:
Having agency is table-stakes when developing taste. If you donât have agency, you can never accomplish what you want. It was a weird coincidence that I ran into two essays about how to develop agency this week.
1ď¸âŁ Luca Dellanna writes, âLow agency is a learned reaction to a past experience that taught them that itâs not worth it to be high agency.â  Therefore, if you remove that conditioning, anyone can become high agency. Â
Neil deGrasse Tyson once said, âWe spend the first year of a child's life teaching it to walk and talk and the rest of its life to shut up and sit down.â The default is to condition children to be low agency.
đ Agency is trainable
2ď¸âŁ
points out that high agency has competitive advantages. Having agency allows you to find things that you have an edge in. And itâs easier to cross the âmoat of low status.âThe moat of low status is one of my favorite concepts, courtesy of my husband Sasha. The idea is that making changes in your life, especially when learning new skill sets, requires you to cross a moat of low status, a period of time where you are actually bad at the thing or fail to know things that are obvious to other people.
Itâs called a moat both because you canât just leap to the other side and because it gives anyone who can cross it a real advantage. - Cate Hall
đŹ Quote of the Week:
âPeople would give anything to quit their jobs. All they have to do is do it. Theyâre people in cages with open doors.â - George Lucas
đ´ââ ď¸ Something Fun:
I like Michelle Khareâs videos because when she learns new skills, sheâs very self-reflective. Here, she goes to Santa School, but she doesnât just learn how to be a good Mrs. Claus. Sheâs learning how to find and fulfill the expectations that everyone has.
đ¨âđ§ If you need help in your writing or creative journey, perhaps I can help you:
â Concept Crafting - Have an idea for an essay but not sure how to get it on paper?
â Whiteboard Ideation - Through a one-hour call, weâll unlock your ideas
â Course Catalyst - Get the most out of taking an online course
And one way to help me:
â Iâm always looking for feedback, and in Cateâs above essay, she suggests this tool for giving feedback anonymously.
You can find more of my writing at chr.iswong.com.
Questions, suggestions, complaints? Email me at [email protected]. Â
Feedback welcome.
If you enjoyed this newsletter, please share it with a friend or two. And feel free to send anything you find interesting to me!
Leaving you in peace,
Chris
I didn't know you like Michelle Khare too hahaha
Thanks Chris. Great bits, as usual.
I agree agency is trainable.
A lot of people are low agency because high agency feels riskier.
You need to act. You need to do stuff. You need to move. You need to put yourself out there. You need, in short, to take some risks and battle (a certain degree of) uncertainty.
We know that people dislike it.
Normally, I find that action is what helps there. It's a bit of tautology but, yes, action develops agency.
You can't think your way to high agency. You have to practice it.